Author Topic: puppy mill- interesting read  (Read 2433 times)

jinxx

  • Socialized
  • ****
  • Posts: 2971
    • JinxxBoxers
puppy mill- interesting read
« on: December 09, 2009, 03:49:50 PM »
this came thru my in box today
thought I'd share FWIW

------------------------

You can't really ban a word. In fact, an attempt to ban something often backfires, particularly in the United States, where we don't like people censoring our speech. So I'm not going to tell you not to say "puppy mill". I'm going to give you some very good reasons for not using that phrase.
 
I speak to a lot of dog clubs and frequently hear dog breeders supporting so-called "anti-puppy- mill" laws. When I ask these people to define "puppy mill," invariably the definitions given include: . People who "overbreed" their dogs; . People who don't take care of their dogs; . People who have too many dogs; . People who breed dogs "just for money"; and . People who don't take health issues into account when breeding their dogs.
 
Let's look at these definitions in turn. What is "overbreeding" ? In the wild, most canids can only reproduce once a year. Most domestic dogs can have two litters a year. When I first became a dog breeder, it was almost a religious belief that no female dog should be bred more than once a year. We were told that it was important to "rest" the uterus between litters. Today, however, thanks to advances in veterinary medicine, we know that an uterus is actually damaged by the elevated progesterone levels that occur in each heat cycle, whether the dog is pregnant or not. Veterinary reproduction specialists recommend that dogs be bred on their second or third heat cycle, that we do more back-to-back breedings, and that we spay the dogs at around age six.
 
The "overbreeding" argument also treats reproduction as something that female dogs wouldn't do if they had a choice. Dogs aren't people - female dogs actually want to be bred when they're in heat and, with few exceptions, enjoy raising their puppies. It's not an unwelcome event for dogs.
 
People who don't take care of their dogs are already guilty of a crime in all 50 states. There is nowhere in the United States where it is legal to neglect or abuse dogs. Sadly, a small minority of all dog breeders - commercial, home and hobby - commit neglect and abuse. Some of these do so out of ignorance, some out of laziness, and some out of meanness. All are already breaking the law. It just needs to be enforced.
 
One of our biggest problems now is that animal radicals insist that every dog be raised like a hothouse flower. One bill proposed this year would have required every kennel to be air conditioned. Many owners of working dogs prefer that their dogs be acclimated to hot weather so that they can work when the temperature goes up. Likewise, sled dogs in the north often sleep outdoors in the snow. Dogs can live and thrive in a wide range of environments. The Arctic Circle, the jungles of Africa, and the deserts of Arabia have all produced breeds of dogs that can live happily in conditions that might not suit all dogs. It is important that we not let activists redefine the needs of dogs to the extent that we are forced to provide a brass bed and a down pillow for every animal in the kennel!
 
What is "too many" dogs? Most of our breeds were developed by wealthy people who kept large numbers of dogs. Hound breeders traditionally kept good-sized packs, and early show breeders did as well. Now that our sport includes more mainstream people - people with jobs or people who need jobs - it's hard for many of us to keep large numbers of dogs. There is no inherent link between numbers of dogs and neglect. People who have the resources to keep big kennels provide a service for all of us, particularly if they maintain a good number of useful stud dogs.
 
Breeding dogs is expensive, and getting more so daily. It's just plain silly to pretend that none of us needs the money generated by puppy sales and stud services. Without that income, the vast majority of middle class breeders could not afford this sport. When our sport was solely in the hands of rich people, it was the norm to sneer at people in "trade", and part of that attitude was handed down to us with the culture of our sport. Today, however, the majority of us in the sport are "in trade", in the sense that we have to work to support ourselves. Our dogs must, at least in part, support themselves or most of us would have to get out of the game.
 
We have among us a small but vociferous group of people who think that breeders only care about producing great hunting or show dogs, and nothing about health. In fact, I've never met a breeder who wasn't concerned about the health of his dogs and the health of his breed. Most health problems in dogs don't have simple solutions, so it is only natural that breeders are often going to disagree about how to address health problems. When there's no right answer to a question, then breeders who follow a different path than you might choose are not necessarily wrong or unconcerned. I know that many believe that commercial breeders don't care about health, but the fact is that their professional organizations provide some of the most sophisticated health seminars in the country for their breeders.
 
Twenty years ago, animal activists created the phrase "puppy mill". Back then, it was only applied to commercial breeders, and then only to those who were breaking the law by neglecting their dogs. In a futile attempt to placate activists, many hobby breeders adopted the term "puppy mill" and used it to separate "them" from "us". It was a mistake then, and it's rapidly becoming fatal today. Every one of these so-called "anti-puppy- mill bills" has a definition that could easily include breeders of hunting and show dogs. Every time you use that phrase, you're contributing to the idea that dog breeders need to be regulated out of existence.
 
The message we need to send to America is that purebred dogs are good, not just because they have pedigrees, but because of their predictability, and that people should shop at least as carefully for a puppy as they do for a car. We don't need to help the animal radicals spread their message by using their favorite term: puppy mill.
 
Jill
JinxxBoxers http://jinxx.us/

CH. Jinxx Burlesque Dancer Zorita-
Jinxx Xcitable Boy Xeno

Bugsys Mom

  • Officially Boxer Crazy
  • ***
  • Posts: 14400
  • I love you man!!
Re: puppy mill- interesting read
« Reply #1 on: December 09, 2009, 04:22:28 PM »
That is a good read and it also stresses that the laws are there and they just need to be enforced and education is the main thing that will change the irresponsible into the responsible.
Vicky

BoxerPerson

  • Best Signature Quote - 2008; Most Addicted Member - 2009
  • Retired Member
  • Officially Boxer Crazy
  • ***
  • Posts: 24423
  • Hey, anybody in there?
Re: puppy mill- interesting read
« Reply #2 on: December 09, 2009, 04:31:02 PM »
My question is...How in the hell is the author able to prove this statement? "...female dogs actually want to be bred when they're in heat and, with few exceptions, enjoy raising their puppies. It's not an unwelcome event for dogs."
I have seen MANY females in heat that DO NOT want anything to do with a male when in heat.
Claire-Mom to Ollie, Zoe, Phoebe, Willie & Snookie

Goofy-Hailey-Nikki-Casey-Tyler-Cynder-Lilli-Daisy-Winnie-Felix-Levi-Ellie-&

Bugsys Mom

  • Officially Boxer Crazy
  • ***
  • Posts: 14400
  • I love you man!!
Re: puppy mill- interesting read
« Reply #3 on: December 09, 2009, 04:33:22 PM »
Claire-It is natural in the wild to be bred.  Its a survival thing.
Vicky

Rubidawg

  • Best Story Teller - 2009
  • Officially Boxer Crazy
  • ***
  • Posts: 7453
    • HeathDawgs
Re: puppy mill- interesting read
« Reply #4 on: December 09, 2009, 04:34:51 PM »
I have seen MANY females in heat that DO NOT want anything to do with a male when in heat.
I believe that this means they are not at the part of their heat cycle where the hormones are ready to be bred. A female can reject a male, until she's ready to conceive pups. (i may be wrong, but that is my understanding)
Dawn
Rubi, CGC - 2.16.05
Bauer - Rocket's Kindred Spirit RN CGC - 4.16.12
Ms. Kitty - 3.15.02
Forever In My Heart: Grady, Branwen's Northern Sky BN RA CGC - 12.22.07 - 5.25.12

Shaeward

  • Socialized
  • ****
  • Posts: 1580
    • Shaeward Boxers
Re: puppy mill- interesting read
« Reply #5 on: December 09, 2009, 05:52:07 PM »
I believe that this means they are not at the part of their heat cycle where the hormones are ready to be bred. A female can reject a male, until she's ready to conceive pups. (i may be wrong, but that is my understanding)

Yes, this is correct. On rare occasions a female will reject the male through out her cycle but this isn't the norm or natural to do so. I've wondered if those that won't accept a male have an underlying health issue of some sort (I personally do not know of any female that has done this, I've only read it can happen from time to time).
~Alisha~
Shaeward Boxers
www.shaewardboxers.com

Newcastle

  • Most Informed Member - 2009
  • Administrator
  • Canine Good Citizen
  • *****
  • Posts: 3079
  • WHEEE!!!!!
    • Newcastle Boxers
Re: puppy mill- interesting read
« Reply #6 on: December 09, 2009, 08:29:54 PM »
There's a reason they refer to "loose" women as "running around like a bitch in heat", after all. ;)  Yes, if the timing isn't right they can be downright nasty, but when they're ready, they're quite willing and many are just hussies.  :laugh4:

This essay, by the way, was written by Cindy Cooke, UKC's Legislative Specialist and owner of the Anstamm Scottish Terrier kennel.  It's called "An Obituary for Words".

http://www.ukcdogs.com/WebSite.nsf/Articles/LegislativeUpdate06012009
« Last Edit: December 09, 2009, 08:36:06 PM by Newcastle »
Jennifer Walker
Newcastle Boxers, Reg'd
Mind ~ Body ~ Spirit ~ Naturally

Visit the Boxer Crazy Store

jinxx

  • Socialized
  • ****
  • Posts: 2971
    • JinxxBoxers
Re: puppy mill- interesting read
« Reply #7 on: December 09, 2009, 08:41:35 PM »
Thanks Jen  :thumbsup:
There was no other info in the email I recieved
Jill
JinxxBoxers http://jinxx.us/

CH. Jinxx Burlesque Dancer Zorita-
Jinxx Xcitable Boy Xeno

blynn03

  • Most Helpful Member - 2008
  • Global Moderator
  • Officially Boxer Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 7074
Re: puppy mill- interesting read
« Reply #8 on: December 10, 2009, 09:12:53 AM »
That was a good read....thanks for posting.   :thumbsup:
*Brandy*

Griff & Bella

DoubleTrouble

  • Retired Member
  • Canine Good Citizen
  • *****
  • Posts: 3006
Re: puppy mill- interesting read
« Reply #9 on: December 10, 2009, 09:18:11 AM »
 :thumbsup:
Deb, Jaimee and Joker
Volunteer for Four Seasons
I lost my mind while working rescue
but found my soul.

BurningRiver

  • Socialized
  • ****
  • Posts: 1827
  • Copper Hill's Crown Jewel, TT
    • Burning River Boxers
Re: puppy mill- interesting read
« Reply #10 on: December 11, 2009, 09:24:20 AM »
There's a reason they refer to "loose" women as "running around like a bitch in heat", after all. ;)  Yes, if the timing isn't right they can be downright nasty, but when they're ready, they're quite willing and many are just hussies.  :laugh4:

My goodness. . . Whoever thinks this has never been around my sweet, innocent Mia when she's in season. She's just rotten. She got even worse after we bred her for the first time.  :smash:
Jessica, Mia and Carter
Burning River Boxers
http://www.burningriverboxers.com

In Heaven: Nedra, CGC 12/24/00-1/29/11

RyanC

  • Fully Weaned
  • *
  • Posts: 51
Re: puppy mill- interesting read
« Reply #11 on: December 11, 2009, 03:51:56 PM »
Sweetie was in heat a few weeks ago, and did she want to get at Red (little tramp she his aunt). About a week after she came out of heat she was still flagging. It was a lot harder to keep her away for Red than him away from her.
Ryan